Editorial: Vote for four-year mayoral termsPublished 8:40am Thursday, October 25, 2012
The neighboring cities of Mason City, Clear Lake, Mankato, Rochester, Owatonna, Fairmont and Faribault all have four-year mayoral terms. And as of 2010, Austin does, too.
Meanwhile, Albert Lea remains stuck in the past with two-year terms. Our mayoral seat has been a revolving door.
Fortunately, voters in Albert Lea have the opportunity Nov. 6 to rectify that by voting yes for a change in mayoral terms. Let’s make them four years.
Any mayor in his or her first year is dealing with the previous mayor’s budget and in the second year the person already is campaigning for re-election. This does little to secure stability or to achieve goals. Any new mayor will build up regional and state connections, only to be voted out.
Some say two-year terms allow voters to kick out mayors they don’t like. Isn’t that sort of a lazy approach, though? Four-year terms will require voters to be more involved and inquisitive prior to voting — and that’s a good thing.
And perhaps more people will be willing to run for mayor because the position looks to be more stable. In other words, candidates would feel like, if elected, they would have a shot at getting some of their state campaign goals accomplished.
More people running for elected office is better for community dialogue and for the voting public.
And a stable mayoral position is good for saving public money because better long-term planning can get accomplished.
Vote yes on Nov. 6 for four-year mayor terms.