Archived Story
In Mpls., Obama presses for gun proposals
Published 2:21pm Monday, February 4, 2013MINNEAPOLIS — With his gun proposals dividing Congress, President Barack Obama took his case for universal background checks and for banning some military-style weapons to the upper Midwest on Monday, looking to build public support for his measures and to apply pressure on lawmakers.
Obama argued that there’s bipartisan support for a system to undertake criminal checks on gun buyers and for gun trafficking laws but, acknowledging the political challenges he faces, would only say that the assault weapons ban deserves a vote in Congress.
“We don’t have to agree on everything to agree it’s time to do something,” he said.
Before his remarks, Obama held a roundtable discussion at the Minneapolis Police Department Special Operations Center, speaking with law enforcement and community leaders.
Obama made his pitch in Minnesota, a Democratic-leaning state where officials have been studying ways to reduce gun-related attacks and accidents for several years. His visit to the Minneapolis Police Department’s Special Operations Center will mark the first time Obama has campaigned on his controversial proposals outside of Washington.
“Changing the status quo is never easy,” Obama said. “This will be no exception. The only way we can reduce gun violence in this county is if it the American people decide it’s important, if you decide it’s important — parents and teachers, police officers and pastors, hunters and sportsmen, Americans of every background stand up and say, ‘This time, it’s got to be different.”’
Ahead of the trip, the White House released a photo of the president skeet shooting at Camp David, the presidential retreat. Obama cited skeet shooting when asked in a recent interview whether he had ever shot a gun.
The president unveiled his sweeping package of proposals for curbing gun violence last month in response to the mass shooting at a Newtown, Conn., elementary school. He vowed to use the full weight of his office to fight for the proposals, many of which face tough opposition from congressional lawmakers and the powerful National Rifle Association.
The reinstatement of the assault weapons ban, which expired in 2004, is expected to be the steepest climb for Obama. Universal background checks for gun purchasers may have an easier time passing Congress, though the NRA also opposes that measure.
White House press secretary Jay Carney, speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, said Obama remained committed to the assault weapons ban and that it was too early to write off prospects for any parts of the package.
“We all recognize that all the components of this are difficult and face challenges, some perhaps even more than others,” Carney said. “But the president’s support is firm and clear.”
Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., has said he hopes his panel can write gun legislation this month, though it’s unclear what it will contain.
The White House picked Minneapolis as the backdrop for Obama’s remarks in part because of recent steps the city has taken to tackle gun violence, including a push for stricter background checks.

Hey Obama ! no matter how many laws you created this Government will never enforce them. Why don’t you Obama take a good hard look at Chicago and their strict gun laws and still these thugs,gangs,losers are still shooting each other up. I find this President a liar, hypcrite on the gun issue when in fact Obama does not mind given guns to Drug Cartels to Mexico (FAST & FURIOUS) so those THUGS can shoot innocent woman,men and children in that country. Obama you are one pitiful low life of so called President who places blame, and has no balls to even be held accountable for your actions. Shame on you.!!!!
Gus, you are out of line, sir. He’s your president for another 4 years and deserves our respect whether you voted for him or not. You’re sounding much like the ‘angry white males’ that listen to the far extreme media, whether it be from the far right or far left. Time magazines’ article a couple of weeks ago shed light showing many of your arguments are overstated. We need to respect and pray for our leaders, not rip them just because we may disagree with them.
I agree, and I wish the same respect would have been shown by the Left towards President Bush.
You earn respect rod (fact) Gus feels the current president has not earned it and you worship the ground he walks on, plus you played the race card a tactic that has grown stale like your argument.
Gus makes a valid point about operation fast and furious care to elaborate about the cover up, the silence of the democracts deafening. Hundereds of dead people and two federal agents are not an overstated that is the ugly inconvenient truth.
Randy, I disagree with many of your thoughts here and I do so without denigrating you, calling you names or ‘dissing’ you by saying that you’re wrong … we disagree. Please spend time reading how Scott Bute responds to what’s written … he does it in a respectful manner. I’m a political moderate without much of a voice in today’s politics. I don’t watch Fox news or MSNBC. I don’t listen to political radio and I don’t read political loggers. I’m not sure where you get the idea I ‘worship the ground’ our President walks on, but I do respect our President, in fact I respect all Presidents. They don’t have to ‘earn’ my respect … once elected, they have it whether I agree with them or not … they’re my country’s President. Randy, in the future, I would hope that you could respond to other peoples responses in a more respectful manner. In that way, I believe more people will respond without worrying about being ‘called out’ by you. Agree to disagree, but do it in a respectful manner. There’s a wonderful book by Thomas Friedman “That Use to be Us” that I would recommend all to read. Try it.
Thanks!
Rod