Print this story |
E-mail story |
This story has 3 comments Add your own |
iPod friendly | Bookmark this
What is this?
Cable TV treats Albert Lea differently than Rochester
Published Saturday, July 5, 2008
I’m just checking to make sure I have this straight. The fancy long article by the Important Charter Guy says we can’t pay $37.22 a month, $20 less than we do now because we are not in the same district as Blue Earth, Bricelyn, Frost and Kiester. The Blue Earth area also receives WCCO-4, KSTP-5, KMSP-9 and KARE-11, plus all the local stations. They get a very good deal for their money.
He also states we are in the same region or district as Rochester and other cities. Rochester gets all the good Twin Cities stations plus all the local ones. It is nice to have both. Albert Lea cannot receive the Minneapolis/St. Paul stations because they just will let us have Austin, Mason City, and Rochester news and TV programming.
He says they are providing us the very best service, he realizes our frustrations and says thank you for not checking out his competition. This Arne “Tucker” Carlson guy is stating: “Either way you lose.”
He must not give much credit to our city manager, mayor and city council for being very sharp if they think our citizens will all be satisfied now.
Remember in the older days there was only one telephone company that served each town and area. However, that had to change over time because that was a monopoly.
Now every town has several companies to choose from depending on one’s needs and price range, etc. Competition is healthy, competition is good for economy, and competition is fair for subscribers. This is not the Dark Ages with one choice or nothing. This is 2008! We deserve better, we are feeling short-changed.
We are very anxious to see how our mayor, city council and manager will work out solving this problem for our Albert Lea citizens. We’ll thank them from the bottom of our hearts for listening after many years of cable service with no Minneapolis/St. Paul stations.
This is my third letter on cable TV because this matters. We’d be thrilled and grateful if Charter will just give us one or two good channels from the Cities. Richard Nixon always said, “Let me make this perfectly clear.” We are getting the short end of the stick. We are trusting that this is not a “wink-wink” situation or arrangement.
Judy Menssen
Albert Lea
WOULD YOU LIKE TO SHARE THIS STORY?



Comments
Posted by scurvydog (anonymous) on July 5, 2008 at 6:17 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Your letters to the editor may be falling on deaf ears - but in business, nothing speaks louder than losing customers.
Posted by menace56 (anonymous) on July 5, 2008 at 11:03 p.m. (Suggest removal)
DIRECTV is my entertainment choice. I dropped cable TV more than 12 years ago.
Posted by DexterDawg (anonymous) on July 7, 2008 at 10:33 a.m. (Suggest removal)
While your point makes good sense, you are utilizing the wrong channel of discussion. it is the regulation imposed by our government that prevents you from watching what you like. Charter and others would love to be deregulated so that they could then offer say new york channels to someone who is from there or has family there. They could make a mint off of this type of premium service. All I'm saying is place the blame where it is due. I think the quote is something like "I'm from the government and I'm here to help".
Post a comment (Terms of Use Policy)
(Requires free registration.)