Print this story |
E-mail story |
This story has 1 comment Add your own |
iPod friendly | Bookmark this
What is this?
Ron Paul should be part of convention
Published Thursday, June 26, 2008
Officials of the Minnesota Republican Party refer to conventions as being part of the political “process.” “Sham” would be a more descriptive term!
Early May 30, I traveled to Rochester to attend the state convention as an elected alternate from Steele County.
Republican presidential candidate Dr. Ron Paul, R-Texas, addressed a rally organized and attended by his supporters who came from all over Minnesota. The rally was held in a park area behind the Mayo Civic Center as all rooms inside were being used for other purposes, we were told. Rep. Paul spoke to the gathering for about 45 minutes beginning at 7:45 a.m. about 400 attended.
As he was speaking, I thought to myself: This man sounds more like a Founding Father than anyone I’ve ever heard in my lifetime. He has dedicated himself to faithfully abiding by principles spelled out in the U.S. Constitution, a rarity in Washington, D.C. today.
Due to a shortage of Steele County delegates present that morning, my friend and I were immediately seated, six rows from the front, from that vantage point, it was very interesting to see how convention officials controlled the whole “process” (sham).
Knowing the “presumptive presidential candidate,” John McCain, was not in attendance, we hoped that Paul would be asked to speak to the convention. But no, he was not allowed to speak and most likely will be kept from addressing the Republican National Convention in St. Paul in September as well.
Later, another process (sham) to elect 14 delegates was so controlled and managed that no Paul supporters would be sent to the national convention.
State chairman Ron Carey and his minions (yes, people) had effectively silenced the voices of candidate Ron Paul and his supporters and chose “shady” GOP strategist Karl Rove to speak instead.
Bob Nesbit
Owatonna
WOULD YOU LIKE TO SHARE THIS STORY?



Comments
Posted by DexterDawg (anonymous) on June 26, 2008 at 10:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)
It should be noted that the rules of the convention very specifically covered everything that this person seems to be calling a "sham". At the start of the convention the rules need to be adopted or modified. There was no objection to the passing of the rules, and they were approved by majority vote. It seems that the people that have been crying foul about the state convention need to understand the process which was completely spelled out in the rules. Next time you come to something as important as this please gain an understanding of the way it works before you get there. Also it should be noted that the state party did not write the rules, the rules committe was made up of individuals from each district and anyone could have contacted them at any time. I believe "sour grapes" might be an appropriate statement.
Post a comment (Terms of Use Policy)
(Requires free registration.)