Print this story | E-mail story | This story has 17 comments Add your own | iPod friendly
Tiger Hills partners ask for change to agreement
Housing market hurts ability to pay
Published Monday, November 24, 2008
The partners of Tiger Hills Development Corp. LLC are coming before the Albert Lea City Council tonight to again ask for an amendment to the phase one agreement of their housing development.
The agreement in place states that the owners are obligated to pay the city for a minimum of four lots per year in phase one of the project, but so far this year they have only paid for two lots. All of the payments are due Nov. 30.
Because of the current housing market conditions, the owners are asking the council to remove the annual minimum obligation of the four lot assessments per year and to allow them to pay the assessments as the lots sell.
In addition, Farmers State Bank, the company that the developers have their letter of credit through, is requesting that the city not call on the letter of credit to pay the assessments, but to instead work with the developers on more flexible terms to obtain payments when lots are sold.
During the Thursday preagenda workshop, City Manager Victoria Simonsen pointed out the different options the council could take.
Victoria Simonsen
Simonsen said the council could not call on the letter of credit or it could lift it. After all, the city has bond payments to make as well, she pointed out.
But if the council did call on the letter of credit, there would be ramifications from that as well.
Albert Lea Mayor Randy Erdman said when making the decision it is important to note how many lots have been sold this year compared to previous years and how many building permits have been issued this year compared to previous years.
In 2004, there were 25 lots sold throughout the city, he said. But in 2008, there have only been eight sold.
In 2004, there were 29 building permits issued, but this year there have only been four. Two of those have belonged to Tiger Hills’ homes.
“The thing is we committed to this in 2005,” Erdman said. “At that time it looked like the right thing to do. Hindsight, maybe it wasn’t. But that development needs to succeed and doesn’t need anymore bashing.”
Simonsen said she expects some other local developers to be present to say they support the request of the Tiger Hills owners.
Last year, the Tiger Hills developers came before the city to request that it not draw on the Tiger Hills letter of credit to make a payment due Nov. 30, 2007.
They sited the downturn in the housing market locally and across the nation as the cause of lack of sales and asked to restructure their debt until market conditions changed.
Randy Erdman
At that time, the council voted to have the mayor and city manager work with the developers on a payment plan for the Nov. 30 payment that was due.
Originally, Tiger Hills developers borrowed $1.4 million from the city to be paid through assessments. They have repaid about 20 percent of that debt.
The development has added $1.78 million in property value to the tax base.
The partners of Tiger Hills Corp. are Greg Moen and Jeff Svoboda.
During the Monday meeting, the council also will:
- Vote on allocating $50,000 in discretionary funds for 2009.
The city received 23 grant applications for the funds totaling $114,000. A committee made up of city staff reviewed the applications and identified whether the city had statutory authority to donate to each request.
That committee made a recommendation to the council to distribute $47,000 of the funds.
During discussion about the topic in the Thursday preagenda workshop, 3rd Ward Councilor George Marin voiced his concern about organizations submitting more than one request, even if it was for two separate events.
“Even though they’re two separate events, they’re really double dipping,” Marin said.
Councilors talked about why some organizations were denied funds, and Simonsen explained that the money is specifically set aside for events that are free to the general public and are cultural or social events.
She said the city did have a few new requests, but there were also several organizations from previous years that did not submit requests.
In the end, she noted, it felt like everyone took a cut in how much they were awarded.
During a point in the discussion, the councilors talked about doing away with the discretionary funds altogether and whether some of the organizations that applied were relying too heavily on the funds.
- Have a public hearing to receive input about changes to the 2009 fee schedule.
Some of the proposed changes to the fee schedule include reducing the amount to adopt an animal from the shelter, increasing boat dock fees, adding hotel inspection fees and increasing library fines, to name a few.
- Have a public hearing to receive input about the distribution of costs in the parking maintenance district that are associated with the downtown.
The parking maintenance district was created in 1976 with the purpose of allocating the costs for providing and maintaining parking for downtown properties.
Proposed changes include eliminating the zones currently in place to divide the cost evenly by the properties. Three other properties not currently in the district would be added. These include the north half of the Freeborn County parking lot, 224 Clark St., and 133 William St.
- Hear a presentation by Hugh Valiant and Emily Hutchins, with the Department of Natural Resources Division of Fisheries, along with a representative of the Shell Rock River Watershed District about shoreland restoration. The presenters will be available to answer questions from the council, staff or members of the public.
- Vote on a request to change the name of Lee Park to Weber Park.
Tribune staff member Ed Shannon, as a member of the Leo Carey American Legion Post, submitted the request at the Nov. 17 Park & Recreation Advisory Board meeting.
Currently at the park there is a plaque on a stone and a flag pole at the site to honor 1st Lt. John Anthony Weber, who was killed in action when his aircraft was shot down on April 7, 1943, near Guadalcanal Island. Weber grew up in a nearby home.
The request was made to honor Weber.
- Vote on whether to adopt the 2009 Albert Lea Port Authority budget.
Albert Lea Economic Development Agency Executive Director Dan Dorman will present the proposed budget as approved at the Oct. 1 Port Authority meeting.
- Have a public hearing about some miscellaneous assessments, including unpaid utility bills, refuse removal and mowing services.
- Vote on whether to defer about $1,700 in assessments at 825 Jefferson Ave. associated with the 2008 mill and overlay project.
- Vote on whether to adopt several policy changes for the Albert Lea Public Library. The Library Advisory Board recommended the changes at its Nov. 20 meeting.
The changes address the increasing number of unattended children at the library, issuing library cards to children and computer lab usage, to name a few of the changes.
- Vote on whether to call a public hearing for Dec. 22 for the rental housing fee schedule.
- Vote on whether to call a public hearing for Dec. 22 for the adoption of the comprehensive plan.
- Vote on whether to call a workshop for 5 p.m. on Dec. 11 with the Freeborn County commissioners.
- Call the initial Truth in Taxation hearing for 7 p.m. on Dec. 1.

Comments
Posted by jed (anonymous) on November 24, 2008 at 10:59 a.m. (Suggest removal)
It's all a great idea when a develper thinks they'll make some money on dividing up land and selling it off for a nice profit!!! It's when these develpoers run into problems and don't make the expected money that causes a problem. Whaaaa!!! Whaaa!! As a tax payer and property owner, I sure wish I could cry to the city and have them pick up my ever increasing property taxes because times are tough!!! Come on, let the develpoers learn a lesson...I'm sure if all of the lots were sold at a nice profit, the developers would be willing to share some of the profit with the city right???? No way Jose!!! Let them learn a lesson and not at the expense of the taxpayers!!!
Posted by shiplady (anonymous) on November 24, 2008 at 12:28 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I agreed with your message. Why should they get a break when all of us are hurting trying to make ends meet.
Posted by outoftownlandlord (anonymous) on November 24, 2008 at 12:53 p.m. (Suggest removal)
They should not get a break. The city is going to stick it to every landlord out there with their fees and new rental law. It is time for the people of Albert Lea to say enoughs enough. Stop passing silly laws, stop wasting our money, stop taxing us to death.... Stop stop stop....
Let the new mayor and council deal with these issues. I want them to repeal the stupid laws (rental) and make these guys pay what they owe. It is not the people of Albert Lea nor the tax payers (which I am one) to fund bad ideas. Business fail why should the city bail them out.
Just shows you why people are not moving to Albert Lea and why more and more are getting out of town. Please wake up and smell the coffee Albert Lea.
Just a side note this is why we voted for a new mayor....
Posted by jed (anonymous) on November 24, 2008 at 2:28 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I bought a lottery ticket the other day and I did not win so can the city give me my dollar back?
I am pretty sure that if I gamble it is at my risk and no one elses....need I say more
Posted by Intheknow (anonymous) on November 24, 2008 at 2:37 p.m. (Suggest removal)
From the article it is clear that Erdman and Simonsen have already decided to support deferring the overdue Tiger Hills payments.So much for decisions being made at the public council meeting. This issue should be put on hold for new leadership to decide.
The public voted for change. It's time for Erdman to go and he should perhaps take Simonsen with him - and maybe Moen's personal finance (wife) director with him.
Posted by Wolfie (anonymous) on November 24, 2008 at 3:07 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Sometimes your the windshield and sometimes your the bug. Seems to me that this time Moen and Svoboda are the bug, they both need to man up and realize that they made a bad choice and deal with it.
Posted by NoDFL (anonymous) on November 24, 2008 at 3:26 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I thought the city was broke. Time for them to pay up. Bad planning on your park doesn't make it an emergance on my part.
I want the same deal I can't pay my water bill and my property tax please Mr. Erdman forgive them......
Get a life and pay up..... I have enough trouble paying my own bills....
Posted by Truth (anonymous) on November 24, 2008 at 4:26 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Mr. Erdman said "In 2004, there were 25 lots sold throughout the city, he said. But in 2008, there have only been eight sold.
In 2004, there were 29 building permits issued, but this year there have only been four. Two of those have belonged to Tiger Hills’ homes."
So tell me why are you now putting restrictions on rentals? Is it to force people to sell or is it to get extra income. Give me a break you and the city council are out to get the little guy. You big money making idea failed so it is back to taking from the little guy. I hope you wait until the new mayor is in before you tax the crap out of us.
Still can't believe only 4 that means the town is getting smaller so government should do the same. Times are tough Tiger Hills..... pay up.
Posted by metisman (anonymous) on November 24, 2008 at 4:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)
It is time for Ms. Vickie to leave with Erdman. She doesn't appear to serve ALL of the citizens of Albert Lea, With Moen's wife as her assistant, right or wrong, there certainly is reason to suspect improper dealings.
Transparency is needed in city government.
Posted by Truth (anonymous) on November 24, 2008 at 5:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Something smells fishy and it is not the lake....
Posted by 57boy (anonymous) on November 24, 2008 at 6:46 p.m. (Suggest removal)
All the above "BINGO"....
table this till the real mayor gets in,& yes...Miss Vicky...hit the road also !!!!!!Quit bailing out the well do do whiners!!!!If this was a common folk you'd be tazed,cuffed,forced to go bankrupt,shamed in the paper,etc,etc!!!!!Make em' pay,we all have to.I lost my job a while back,should I get a reduced sewer & water rate?
phone rate?cable rate???????Why do the hot shots think they don't have to be held accountable !!!!!!Simply got in over their heads by one thing.....GREED !!!!!!!! PAY UP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by Wildbill (anonymous) on November 24, 2008 at 8:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I think if you check back in the records, the City Manager was not in favor of Tiger Hills(atleast parts of it). Of course our new Mayor and City Council will be flawless.
Posted by mmurtaugh (anonymous) on November 24, 2008 at 10:19 p.m. (Suggest removal)
For the record, I believe tonight's meeting was a perfect example of what is wrong with the present meeting arrangement. There were multiple topics tonight, such as the 2009 fee schedule, discretionary funds, and the Tiger Hills request, that citizens did not have adequate notice in which to discuss these items with their council members.
Although this article appeared the same day as the meeting, it is not the responsibility of the newspaper to provide notice about these topics. It would not substantially matter whether this article had appeared Sunday, or even Friday.
It is my intention that council meeting agendas will be developed in a way that will allow more time for citizens to contact their council members to discuss topics, or to plan with enough warning to attend the meeting and give input if they so choose.
Mike Murtaugh
Mayor-Elect
Posted by allake (anonymous) on November 24, 2008 at 10:42 p.m. (Suggest removal)
WIldbill,
She was on board at the beginning. And if she was against this tonight it sure did not come across that way.
Posted by 3trees (anonymous) on November 24, 2008 at 10:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)
will see how perfect you will be mayor-elect.
Posted by metisman (anonymous) on November 24, 2008 at 10:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Murtaugh will have to be perfect to off-set the imperfect Erdman? Sounds like sour grapes over losing the election.
Just my opinion.
Posted by allake (anonymous) on December 2, 2008 at 12:07 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I can't believe the sour grapes over the election by some. I got an ear full over the weekend from an outspoken (or big mouthed) member of the higher taxes are good things crowd. She really can't believe Randy lost and blamed the loss on lots of people but must not be able to find a mirror to look into.
Post a comment (Terms of Use Policy)
(Requires free registration.)