Print this story | E-mail story | This story has 6 comments Add your own | iPod friendly | Bookmark this Facebook bookmark del.icio.us bookmark StumbleUpon bookmark Digg bookmark What is this?

Editorial: Vote yes on outdoors measure

Published Tuesday, October 21, 2008

State legislators should have done their jobs last spring and set up a dedicated funding stream for preserving Minnesota’s treasured landscapes. They should have done it in any of the past 10 legislative sessions, for that matter. But they didn’t. This year, they punted the decision to the voters.

The voters should accomplish what leaders have failed to do and approve the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment on Nov. 4. In the past decade, while lawmakers couldn’t figure out what to do, many of the longtime recreational places of Minnesota were turned into vacation homes and second mansions. Many lakes and streams have become polluted. Our children will have fewer places for fishing, hunting, hiking, camping, canoeing, bird-watching and hearing the call of the common loon.

This has got to stop. We are losing our cultural identity as one of the most beautiful states in the country. We are destroying our tourism engine. Minnesotans not only want to protect land and water for the next generations, they need it. Minnesotans need clean water, wildlife habitat, trails, parks and tourism. Minnesotans need this funding stream.

Anyone who enjoys the great outdoors should support the amendment.

But there’s more in it than just for the outdoors. It also provides funding for arts and cultural heritage. If you support places such as historical museums, community theaters and art centers, you also will want to vote for this amendment.

It calls for three-eights of 1 percent on taxable sales until 2034. For those who are counting, the small tax will pay for itself in the tourist dollars for decades to come. For those who aren’t counting, just think of the benefits for your children.

Give your kids a present. Vote yes on the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment.


WOULD YOU LIKE TO SHARE THIS STORY?

Bookmark and Share



Comments

Posted by Truthbetold (anonymous) on October 21, 2008 at 10:33 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I thought the state lottery was supposed to take care of our natural resources. Isn't that what the ads say at the end of the lottery commercials? I don't think giving the State more money is going to take care of the problem if they can't with the money they've taken in already.

Posted by NoDFL (anonymous) on October 21, 2008 at 12:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I knew the Tribune would support taking more from the tax payer it fits their style. This is a bad bill why don't you tell the whole story like the arts part. You won't because then people won't vote for it.

Posted by allake (anonymous) on October 21, 2008 at 2:03 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I am still not sure how I am going to vote. But it is really strange they did not talk about the art funding part of this.

Posted by diddlyscrumps (anonymous) on October 21, 2008 at 3:18 p.m. (Suggest removal)

the art funding part is the part i like the best.

Posted by allake (anonymous) on October 21, 2008 at 8:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I don't have a problem with the arts funding, I have not been convinced that we really should be doing this in the constitution. But the fact of the matter is that the Tribune leaving the arts funding out of this looks and smells "fishy".

Posted by NoDFL (anonymous) on October 21, 2008 at 8:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I would agree with you on the fishy idea. When you want something passed hide the stink. The Tribune is no different be it this issue or others.

Post a comment (Terms of Use Policy)

The Tribune encourages healthy, respectful dialogue in the spirit of community enlightenment. It's OK to disagree, but be courteous and civil. Name-calling, vulgarity and claims of criminality are subject to removal.

(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:




advanced search

© 2010 Albert Lea Tribune, Inc. All rights reserved.
A Boone Newspapers Inc. publication.

Contact us | Privacy Policy