Print this story | E-mail story | This story has 8 comments Add your own | iPod friendly | Bookmark this Facebook bookmark del.icio.us bookmark StumbleUpon bookmark Digg bookmark What is this?

Senate candidate Barkley gains ground

Independence Party candidate stops in Albert Lea

Published Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Independence Party candidate for U.S. Senate Dean Barkley said he is trying to give voters a chance to vote for who they want, not who they are told to vote for.

Barkley seeks the Senate seat now held by Republican Sen. Norm Coleman. The DFL candidate is Al Franken.

Recent polls suggest that Barkley would get 18 percent of the vote if the election were held today. Barkley attended a luncheon campaign gathering at the Albert Lea American Legion Club Tuesday.

“I am trying to present an option for change,” Barkley said.

His recent rise in the polls comes as no surprise to him. He said he feels he is gaining ground at the expense of the incumbent.

“I feel that I have demystified Norm Coleman for the people of Minnesota,” he said.

Dean Barkley

Barkley said he is aiming at the exurbs, the area stretching from 30 to 120 miles from the Twin Cities. He believes many former Coleman supporters are ready for a change.

“It is no surprise that Norm doesn’t understand the economy. He has never worked in the private sector in his life,” Barkley said.

He criticized his GOP opponent for refusing to support limits on earmarks in public spending bills and talked about restoring public faith in government.

Derek Nelson is the Independence Party chairman for District 27A and liked what he heard from Barkley. Nelson is looking for change in the 2008 senatorial election, and thinks he has found it in Barkley.

“I’m hearing a lot of buzz about Dean’s candidacy. I think people can come together for him because he is a good leader,” Nelson said.

He said he hopes a strong third-party showing in this year’s Senate race will help move Minnesota in a different direction. Nelson said he has been voting for 20 years and has seen little change from politics as usual.

Barkley said he thinks the financial bailout is showing signs of helping to ease the current credit crunch but wants to promote legislation to prevent a recurrence of the country’s economic problems.

“The Sarbanes-Oxley bill was passed after the Enron scandal, and I think we need something similar here,” Barkley said.

He recommends stiff penalties for financial executives who are caught lying to the public and government regulators. Restoring confidence in the financial system was cited by Barkley as a key element in the nation’s economic recovery.

The credit crunch has squeezed many students and their parents as they try to finance college expenses, and Barkley said he feels their pain.

“We have two kids in college so we know what they are going through,” he said.

Fierce criticism of his opponents was a feature of Barkley’s address to supporters. He lambasted Franken as a New Yorker who has flown into Minnesota as a savior of the middle class. But his sharpest jibes were directed at Coleman, whose recent change in campaign tactics drew sharp fire from Barkley.

Endless negative ads having ricocheted against him, Barkley said. Now his opponent has adopted a softer tone.

“Norm has gotten all soft and gooey here lately, but that’s just a sign that my campaign has taken hold among his supporters and he knows he’s in trouble,” Barkley said.

Blasting Coleman for having no core values, he criticized his Republican opponent for being a symbol of all that is wrong with Washington’s elite power brokers.

“Norm Coleman took $3 million from bankers, so how can he be expected to regulate them?” Barkley asked.

Barkley said he hopes to help lead the country in a new direction if elected to the Senate, where he served briefly, filling out the term of the late DFL Sen. Paul Wellstone in 2002. He recommends federal vouchers given to voters who could then split the voucher funds among candidates of their choice. Congress should impose spending limits on itself, involving no new spending unless the funds come from other programs already budgeted.

“Congress needs to accept a new reality,” Barkley said. “Maybe I’m a Don Quixote tilting my lance against windmills, but we cannot keep spending money we do not have.”

Putting Social Security on a sound financial footing and cutting military spending are other priorities for Barkley as he crisscrosses the Gopher state in his uphill battle for office.

“Ever since the end of the Cold War, I have been waiting for a peace dividend, but I have not seen it yet. Do we really need a defense budget that is bigger than all other nations in the world combined?”

Barkley would support ending the long war in Iraq and refocusing the nation’s military energies elsewhere.

“We need to fight the terrorists where they are, and that’s in Afghanistan and Pakistan.”


WOULD YOU LIKE TO SHARE THIS STORY?

Bookmark and Share



Comments

Posted by Truthbetold (anonymous) on October 22, 2008 at 12:18 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I would consider voting for Mr. Barkley, but I figure a vote for him is really a vote for Franken, so I don't know if I can do that!

Posted by metisman (anonymous) on October 22, 2008 at 1:26 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Barkley makes sense.

Barkley saves me from having to vote for Franken. Both the DFL & Republican parties need to get back to representing ALL of Minnesota.

Posted by mosedart (anonymous) on October 22, 2008 at 2:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Truthbetold, that is the dumbest, most ignorant thing I have ever read. You vote for the guy you want to win, period. A vote for Barkley is a vote for Barkley. A vote for Franken is a vote for Franken. In no way is a vote for Barkley a vote for Franken. People like you are exactly what is wrong with American politics and people like you are the ones that keep on providing us with only two choices in each election which most of the time is voting between the lesser of two evils. If people like you would grow a pair then maybe we could see some ACTUAL change in this country.

Posted by allake (anonymous) on October 22, 2008 at 4:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I would like to see us change the primary so that only 2 people came out. I don't like to see people elected with less than 50% of the vote. I don't thing Pawlenty would have been reelected, so it cuts both ways. But as much as I like Barkley, unless he wins, we end up with the Franken.

Posted by NoDFL (anonymous) on October 22, 2008 at 5 p.m. (Suggest removal)

mosedart,

In a perfect world you would be right. Vote for who you believe in. The problem is this is not a perfect worls and we would get Franken which is just to scary to think about.

Posted by tamilynne (anonymous) on October 27, 2008 at 10:23 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Barkley is the ONLY choice in my opinion! I don't like Coleman, and Franken needs to grow up.

I am glad that there is a good, strong independent running. This country has gotten too set that it is either demacrat or republican. We need less people just voting for the party just because they always vote with their party.

Lets get back to basics, vote for what you really believe in, not what your party tells you to believe.

Posted by mnisgreat (anonymous) on October 28, 2008 at 9:26 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Can someone please explain to me what exactly Norm Coleman has done for Minnesotans? Besides fishing trips to Alaska with now convicted felon Ted Stevens.

Norm recently said, "We have real problems out there, real challenges. In the end it's about who can work out there and who can solve it."

So just what exactly has Norm done for Minnesota as a Senator?? I have asked this question repeatedly and so far I haven't gotten one clear answer.

I don't think any of us asked for 80% increases in our health care premiums, or 20% decreases in our home values, or 6.2% unemployment in Minnesota, shipping 100's of thousands of jobs overseas, or $700 billion of our tax paying dollars going to Iraq, or another $700 billion dollars of our tax paying dollars going to Wall Street.

No I am certainly not going to reward Norm Coleman for this horrendous performance. Al has some good ideas for changing the course of this country and getting Minnesota back on track to bringing more jobs to our state and stopping the redistribution of wealth FROM the middle class into the pockets of the top 5%.

Posted by BB27 (anonymous) on October 29, 2008 at 1:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Norm has done a lot for the state, including bringing the Minnesota Wild to St. Paul, and keeping the Ford plant in Minneapolis up and running by going to Michigan and pleading their case when they were almost eliminated. He has also done good work with the elderly. The National Education Association gave him an "A" grade for his work. How about his work on the 07 farm bill, it contained a lot of good things for minnesota taxpayers. Home values had nothing to do with Norm. Al scares the daylights out of me, I don't see how he will get anything done.

Post a comment (Terms of Use Policy)

The Tribune encourages healthy, respectful dialogue in the spirit of community enlightenment. It's OK to disagree, but be courteous and civil. Name-calling, vulgarity and claims of criminality are subject to removal.

(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:




advanced search

© 2010 Albert Lea Tribune, Inc. All rights reserved.
A Boone Newspapers Inc. publication.

Contact us | Privacy Policy