Print this story | E-mail story | This story has 7 comments Add your own | iPod friendly | Bookmark this Facebook bookmark del.icio.us bookmark StumbleUpon bookmark Digg bookmark What is this?

City faces $1 million cut over 2 years

Albert Lea officials brace for reduction in services

Published Wednesday, June 17, 2009

Albert Lea will see a $337,500 cut to local government aid in 2009 and a $778,700 cut in 2010, under Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty’s proposed unallotments announced Tuesday.

Though these numbers are lower than Pawlenty’s original LGA proposed cuts in January, city leaders say the cuts will still mean reduced city services and probably employees.

“There’s no way we are going to balance our budget without reducing services,” said Albert Lea Finance Director Rhonda Moen.

She noted she fully expected the governor to hold firm to his January proposal of a $500,000 cut for 2009 and a more than $1 million cut for 2010 for the city. However, she would not be surprised if Pawlenty came back later and made additional cuts.

Albert Lea Mayor Mike Murtaugh said he thinks the city is well-positioned to manage the reductions after taking significant citizen input about the budget in March and April.

Rhonda Moen

Mike Murtaugh

Victoria Simonsen

Tim Pawlenty

Robin Brown

While the unallotment plan is less than Pawlenty’s January proposal, it is still more than what the Minnesota House or Senate plans would have cut, Murtaugh said. These cuts come on the heels of a $400,000 unallotment to the city in the last two weeks of 2008.

Albert Lea City Manager Victoria Simonsen said now that city staff have Pawlenty’s numbers they will start the formal budgeting process for 2010.

Simonsen said she has provided all of the different department heads with the amount they need to reduce from their budgets. The department heads will turn in their preliminary budgets by July 10, and then she will start meeting with them individually the following week. A pretty firm budget will be in place by the end of August.

The city manager said the cuts this year will be covered fairly well with the different programs the city has started to implement, such as early retirement and other one-time revenue sources.

But these are not sustainable cuts, she said. On top of all of the cuts, the city is also anticipating less revenue this year. The number of unpaid assessments are up, and property tax payments are not coming in at 100 percent.

Plus, negotiations are just beginning with the different unions, and it is unclear what changes there will be in health care costs.

“All of those things have to be factored in,” Simonsen said.

During his announcement Tuesday, Pawlenty said Minnesotans and people all across the country have faced the economic crisis by tightening their belts, and the state of Minnesota should do the same.

“As families are living within their means, government should do the same,” Pawlenty said.

The governor emphasized during the Tuesday press conference that the unallotments were just proposals — that they still have to go before the state Legislative Advisory Commission and that additional input and reaction could be received. However, they do cover the $2.7 billion budget shortfall facing the state.

He acknowledged that additional pressure will be put on government agencies because of the unallotments and noted that there would be layoffs as a result, but he didn’t want to estimate on the number of those layoffs.

Freeborn County Administrator John Kluever said he had not received the exact unallotment figures yet for the county, but the cuts weren’t anything unexpected.

“The department heads and elected officials have been very diligent in making recommended cuts,” Kluever said. “I think we’re in a pretty good position to react.”

The unallotments will be just one piece of information for the Freeborn County commissioners to take into consideration when approaching future budgeting, he said.

Pawlenty said counties will be capped at no more than a 1.19 percent cut in revenue for the first year of the biennium. The second year will be capped at a 2.41 percent cut in revenue. He defined revenue as aid plus levy.

District 27A Rep. Robin Brown said Freeborn County will see a $226,000 cut to aid in 2009 and a $450,000 cut to aid in 2010.

Under the governor’s unallotment proposals there will be a total of $300 million in aid cut to cities, counties and townships across the state.

This was the highest group of unallotments, followed next by state health and welfare, which will take a $236 million trim in human services spending and the end to the state’s General Assistance Medical Care program on March 1, 2010.

He also announced he will defer state aid to K-12 schools by $1.8 billion in fiscal year 2010, though schools will get their full aid entitlement in the second half of the fiscal year.

State higher education funding will be cut by $100 million, and state agencies will have to cut $33 million from their budgets.

Brown said one of her biggest concerns with the governor’s unallotment proposals was that Pawlenty made it seem as if he was only making a 4 percent cut to the different areas where cuts were made. But these cuts are really in addition to the cuts already made during the Legislative session. Adding those on, the total cuts are really closer to 10 percent.

“I still would have been much happier had he signed the balanced budget that we sent him,” she said.

She noted Pawlenty heavily went after LGA and health care, which are the two main areas he had talked about reducing beforehand.

“We should not be surprised that’s what he did,” Brown said.

Look to future issues of the Tribune for more information about local school and hospital unallotments.


WOULD YOU LIKE TO SHARE THIS STORY?

Bookmark and Share



Comments

Posted by Intheknow (anonymous) on June 16, 2009 at 6:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Robin Brown's "balanced budget" relied on once again on raising taxes. So much for real leadership from her.

Everyone is facing cuts in this recession. Why would local governments dream that they would be exempt?

And likely we will find out that many city and county services really aren't wanted or needed.

What a bunch of overeacting drama queens - more worried about their political status than the public they purport to serve.

Posted by newyankee (anonymous) on June 17, 2009 at 8:07 a.m. (Suggest removal)

It is the costs associated with the union retirement and health care that is a major issue here. Plus when you have a closed shop and or service, there is no competition or incentive to be efficient with our money.

In recent meetings between the unions and state negotiators, the unions were suggesting tax increases as a way to avoid job losses. So again, the unions use taxpayer money to lobby for more of our money. I think that is wrong. I think it is also wrong that we do not even get a choice or vote on who is allowed to provide services.

If we converted the retirement accounts to a 401K, like the taxpayers most commonly have, instead of a defined benefit retirement plan we would not need to cut any services.

Posted by Wildbill (anonymous) on June 17, 2009 at 10:09 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I'm just mad that people don't feel a responsbility to pay their taxes.

Posted by crzy_mama2mny (anonymous) on June 17, 2009 at 1:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)

What about getting rid of the city manager's $500/month car allowance? Seems she should be willing to "reduce the budget" as well. How about shutting off the fountains in the lake? What about making the Tiger Hills Developer pay the money back to the city as was stipulated in the original agreement? All very good suggestions but none will happen. Instead, they will cut people's jobs and then expect the ones that are left to do even more work than when they were fully staffed. Sounds like a great idea to me!

Posted by Culture_Warrior (anonymous) on June 17, 2009 at 4:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Someone had to be the adult in the room. This time, it was Governor Pawlenty. The Democrats run the entire show in our legislature in St. Paul. Now they are whining about how these cuts are all the Governor's fault. They had no plan outside of raising taxes on Minnesota families during a severe recession. There is nothing more irresponsible than that!

Posted by NOGOP (anonymous) on June 17, 2009 at 8 p.m. (Suggest removal)

"Someone has to be the adult in the room," Give me a break!!!

Pawlenty is acting like a spoiled brat that say No, either we do it my way or I will take my toys and go home!!!!!!!!!
So what is the Pawlenty way,

The poor will not have healthcare!!!
Our property taxes will go threw the roof again!!!!
Local services will be cut!!!!
College tuition cost will skyrocket!!!
K-12 Education will have to borrow money to operate!!!
Many more Minnesotans will lose there jobs putting even more stress on unemployment and human services.

What Pawlenty is going is irresponceable!!!!!

Posted by goodcitizen (anonymous) on June 17, 2009 at 8:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Wow, crzy_mama2mny do tell! The City Manager, who is the highest paid employee in our city, and gets top benefits, also gets a $500/month car allowance. Has anyone considered that her job could be done for a lot less? Has anyone considered what could be done with the amount of money she makes in salary and benefits for just one year?? What she makes is over a third of the $337,500 cut in AL government aid in 2009. Come on Mayor and City Council - when are you going to start making decisions that benefit the citizens of AL and not just "special" individuals. Who is really in charge of our city? I support the residents of AL holding our elected officials accountable during these very tough financial times.

Post a comment (Terms of Use Policy)

The Tribune encourages healthy, respectful dialogue in the spirit of community enlightenment. It's OK to disagree, but be courteous and civil. Name-calling, vulgarity and claims of criminality are subject to removal.

(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:




advanced search

© 2010 Albert Lea Tribune, Inc. All rights reserved.
A Boone Newspapers Inc. publication.

Contact us | Privacy Policy