Print this story |
E-mail story |
This story has 5 comments Add your own |
iPod friendly | Bookmark this
What is this?
Judge rules 13-year-old boy must see doctor for cancer
Published Saturday, May 16, 2009
Minnesota parents who refused chemotherapy for their 13-year-old son were ordered Friday to pick a doctor and get their son’s tumor X-rayed to determine if the boy would still benefit from the cancer treatment — or if it may already be too late.
In a 58-page ruling, Brown County District Judge John Rodenberg found Daniel Hauser has been “medically neglected” by his parents, Colleen and Anthony Hauser. The judge allowed Daniel to stay with his parents, noting they love him and acted in good faith. But he gave them until Tuesday to get an updated chest X-ray and select an oncologist.
If the tumor has not increased in size and if Daniel’s prognosis remains as optimistic as doctors testified last week, then chemotherapy and possible future radiation appeared to be in Daniel’s best interest, Rodenberg wrote.
“The state has successfully shown by clear and convincing evidence that continued chemotherapy is medically necessary,” he wrote. He said he would not order chemotherapy if doctors find the cancer has advanced to a point where it is “too late.”
However, he said, if chemotherapy is ordered and the family still refuses, Daniel will be placed in temporary custody.
It was unclear how the medicine would be administered if the boy fights it. Dr. Bruce Bostrom, a pediatric oncologist at Children’s Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota, said last week he would have a hard time forcing Daniel to take the medicine. Bostrom said Friday his hospital has psychologists, child life specialists and other resources to help ease Daniel’s fears. He also said an ethics committee would meet next week to talk about all the scenarios doctors may encounter.
Calvin Johnson, an attorney for Daniel’s parents, said the family is considering an appeal. For now, he said, the boy is abiding by the order and making an appointment to get an X-ray.
Daniel was diagnosed with Hodgkin’s lymphoma in January and it was recommended he have six rounds of chemotherapy. He underwent one round in February, but stopped after that single treatment. He and his parents opted instead for “alternative medicines,” citing religious beliefs.
Doctors have said Daniel’s cancer had a 90 percent chance of being cured with chemotherapy and radiation. Without those treatments, doctors said his chances of survival are 5 percent.
WOULD YOU LIKE TO SHARE THIS STORY?



Comments
Posted by MRSimmons (Mike Simmons) on May 17, 2009 at noon (Suggest removal)
Apparently this 13 year old boy, who was home schooled by his obviously stupid parents, cant read. The Star Tribune stated today that when they tried to get him into a charter school, he couldn't recognize the word "the" He also claimed to be a medicine man, something that all 13 year olds in this bogus religion can become, for a fee. I understand that there are people out there trying to take advantage of others, but these parents should never have been allowed to reproduce. Kudos to the state for making this child get life saving treatment, now look into taking the parents children away from them. Some parents are just to stupid to have children, these parents are the poster child for stupid, ignorant people.
Posted by hotrod (anonymous) on May 17, 2009 at 8:37 p.m. (Suggest removal)
THESE PARENTS SHOULD BE PUT IN JAIL SO THEY CAN NOT REPRODUCE.
Posted by gone (anonymous) on May 17, 2009 at 10:30 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Certainly at a point a thirteen year old child could make a decision to stop aggressive treatment. Unfortunately he does not have the knowledge or parents that he needs to make a good decision. I would concur with the 'neglect' label.
Posted by trifid (anonymous) on May 18, 2009 at 1:58 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The conservatives agreeing with big government that is intruding on people's private lives? How odd. And all that money spent by the state, your precious tax dollars, for people who probably have no health insurance? Since when did the conservatives begin caring about the poor sick in this state?
Must be one of those cherry picking issues.
Posted by leftys2221 (anonymous) on May 18, 2009 at 8:23 a.m. (Suggest removal)
It upsets me for the sole reason that this was a treatable case of cancer and they were trying to turn down treatment, a lot of people do not get that choice when they have cancer.
Post a comment (Terms of Use Policy)
(Requires free registration.)