Print this story | E-mail story | This story has 5 comments Add your own | iPod friendly | Bookmark this Facebook bookmark del.icio.us bookmark StumbleUpon bookmark Digg bookmark What is this?

Lowered book prices not really a good deal

Published Tuesday, October 27, 2009

I am a consumer. In many ways I am the poster child of American consumerism. My credit card statements are monthly reminders of that.

I like deals. Total sucker for the word clearance. I like the way it rolls off the tongue. Say it out loud with me once.

“kleer-uhns”

OK, one more time. Some of you didn’t say it out loud. That’s part of the activity.

“kleer-uhns”

It’s been some years since I attended a preppy private college in Texas, but when I did I felt the need to max out my Dayton’s (dating myself) charge card. But most of the items I purchased were from the clearance rack. You see, at some point I figured out I could get more items for my borrowed money if I waded through the clearance. It helped that I had eccentric (some would “lack of”) taste. It worked in my favor that I was clueless on what did and didn’t match. As you can see, I had a lot going for me.

Fast forward 15 years and I still have a propensity to spend, just not so much on clothes. One of my current interests is books, which couples well with my day job teaching English. Now all I need to peruse the clearance racks for are cardigans. So it’d be a natural assumption that I’d be an ecstatic consumer when talking about the recent fire sale on books started by Walmart and ignited by Amazon.com and Target. Walmart recently put some of the publishing world’s marquee authors’ hard cover editions on sale for $10. Amazon matched that. Walmart retaliated by going to $9. Amazon matched that. Walmart then went to $8.99. Shortly after that Target jumped into the mix.

Riley Worth

These are hard-cover books that used to sell for upward of $25. Granted, I almost never buy the hard-cover edition when it comes out. In fact, it’s a silly tradition that I think needs to go away. Get rid of hard cover altogether and debut the book in paperback. In the age of Kindle, they both sound a bit antiquated.

And while this all looks like a great thing for consumers, it’s not. Clearance pricing on non-clearance items is not great, especially when it’s regarding books.

According to an article in Entertainment Weekly magazine (“Bookselling Blues”), the publishing industry has had a disappointing year. Some A-list authors such as Dan Brown (“Da Vinci Code” series) and Mitch Albom (“Tuesdays With Morrie” and “Five People You Meet In Heaven”) are not selling like they should.

Interestingly, my anecdotal evidence shows the contrary happening. High school students seem to be doing more leisure book reading, at least in my class when they’re supposed to be focused on the lesson. The “Twilight” series was huge.

But, alas, teenagers are not the publishing industry’s primary consumer. Apparently, they are not reading the new John Grisham and Stephen King books, nor the new Sarah Palin book — “Going Rogue: An American Life” — nor the newest book mocking Sarah Palin — “Going Rouge: An American Life.”

Just as the “big box” companies are not the answer for so many things, they are not the answer to the publishing industry’s woes now. By slashing prices on the mainstays, such as Grisham, Barbara Kingsolver and Jon Krakauer, it’s doing two things:

1. Making it nearly impossible for independent book stores to compete for debuting book business

2. Making consumers believe that $9 and $10 is the only price we should pay for debuting books.

I’m no economist, but by altering the market so severely, it’s clear the long-range future of publishing will be altered. According to an Associated Press story, the American Booksellers Association recently notified the U.S. Department of Justice, asking for an investigation into the antics of Amazon, Walmart and Target.

How are publishing companies supposed to take risks on first-time authors if they don’t have the financial cushion usually provided them by the mainstays? Cheaper prices for big-name authors may eventually hurt the big names. But they’ve already made millions off advances, book sales and movie rights. It’s the as-yet-unheard-of authors that will be most impacted by ridiculously cheap prices.

Who knows? One of those as-yet-unheard-of authors may be sitting in my class right now reading a book instead of paying attention to the lesson. But we’ll never know if the price of books is forever devalued and book publishers cannot take the risk on a new author.

Riley Worth can be reached at rileyworth@gmail.com.


WOULD YOU LIKE TO SHARE THIS STORY?

Bookmark and Share



Comments

Posted by NoDFL (anonymous) on October 27, 2009 at 7:38 p.m. (Suggest removal)

So let me get this straight. You want us to pay more for books.... Really you want to tell us the consumer to pay more. I am scratching my head here. Like you said you are not an economist. That is true because you have no understanding of the market system. In a free market system people are free to enter into an exchange. If Walmart wants to sell their product for $8.99 and I want to buy it for $8.99 then who are you to tell me no.

Next shouldn't we want more people to read. These prices make it easier to get kids reading. When they get hooked than they become readers for years.

I think your real problem is you think because someone writes a book it makes them better than those dirty capitalist. It doesn't. Those guys are capitalist. They need profit. Lots of time they forget that. Some of those you listed I will not read again because they have forgot that and now use their books to push a political idea. You want to help them remind them they are capitalist entertainers in a free market. They don't have to write and I don't have to buy. You Mr. Worth don't need to worry about the poor writters I think they will be fine.

Posted by TameThaTane (anonymous) on October 28, 2009 at 5:07 a.m. (Suggest removal)

1. Making it nearly impossible for independent book stores to compete for debuting book business---->So it's one group of companies responsibility to make sure the other competing companies can compete against them and win?

2. Making consumers believe that $9 and $10 is the only price we should pay for debuting books. ---->It IS the only price we should pay and less if possible thank you. We should be getting them online for $1.99 or less. This is what happens when eggheads play businessmen.

Posted by newyankee (anonymous) on October 28, 2009 at 7:59 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I thought of the drug makers as I read this article. One of the markets where they can raise capital for further research is the USA. But the argument is we should force them to lower their prices for the consumer.

Posted by jcorey2 (Jeremy Corey-Gruenes) on October 28, 2009 at 11 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Mr. Worth,
You, sir, are a communist!!!!!!

Just kidding.

I liked the column. Worth explains an interesting trend in the book business. Because we all (including the columnist) like bargains so much, bucking this trend looks a little unlikely.

Posted by NoDFL (anonymous) on October 28, 2009 at 5:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)

If they are willing to produce at a lower price who are you to tell them no? This goes for everything. I am old enough to remember the chants "Free South Africa".

We should bring it back but we should be chanting "Free the market place" "Free capitalism" "Free your mind and your wallet will follow"

Get out of my life, my wallet, and my home.....

Post a comment (Terms of Use Policy)

(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:




advanced search

© 2009 Albert Lea Tribune, Inc. All rights reserved.
A Boone Newspapers Inc. publication.

Contact us