Print this story |
E-mail story |
This story has 4 comments Add your own |
iPod friendly | Bookmark this
What is this?
Sunday is a day for lovers of traditional values
Published Tuesday, February 9, 2010
I can hardly wait for the 14th. It’s such a wonderful day, set aside to honor something that’s really only important to a few of us, so it’s nice for others to play along and celebrate the day across the country. After all the freezing rain, snow and wind I’ve survived so far this winter, on Sunday, I’m looking forward to hearing all the nice things people say about Arizona. Lots of Midwesterners from across the frozen north are gathering down there now, paying homage to this great state. It’s great how everyone makes Arizonans feel so welcome.
What? It’s really about Valentine’s Day? How disappointing!
All silliness aside, however, I do celebrate Arizona because it influenced me in two significant ways. First, when you grow up in a desert, you grow up with a keen sense of how fragile the natural world is. Saguaros take almost a century to grow to full maturity. The thin topsoil of the Sonora carries scars from covered wagons (and ATVs) for decades afterwards. Water is a precious resource, especially with all of those internal immigrants drinking so much of it; it’s dangerous to waste it on invasive greenery or contaminate it with toxic industrial or agricultural waste.
David Behling
The second thing is more relevant to my life now. Growing up in Arizona meant living with conservative values — flowing at least in part from witnessing what happens when we don’t “conserve” our natural environment. Those values also flowed from living with all the decisions about Arizona’s wealth that were made outside the state, politically in Washington, D.C. or economically in California.
I grew up among people who were independent thinkers, skeptical of all outsiders and big government outsiders in particular. Many of us suffered at the hands of multinational mining companies or out-of-state real estate developers or watched water from Arizona watersheds flow into the swimming pools of Los Angeles. There was a libertarian streak in most of us, whichever party we belonged to. I grew up Republican, believe it or not, and once was even chosen to serve as a delegate to the State Party Convention.
Although I long ago severed any official connections to the Republican Party, and no longer have any party affiliation, I still find myself more often sharing the conservative (sometimes even libertarian) perspective on issues facing us — health care reform, the budget deficit, government control of too much of our lives, etc.
But wait, many readers are saying right now. There’s no way this guy can be a conservative! By their definition of the word, of course, they would be right. I’m not that kind of “conservative.”
The baggage that word carries is the main reason conservatives like me keep our heads down. It’s too easy to confuse us with those angry people at the Tea Parties hating taxes of any kind and the government, getting all Leviticus with homosexuals, and opposing anything that Pres. Obama believes is a good idea.
It’s vital that conservatives involved in the Tea Party movement understand that it is a populist uprising, not a conservative one. Populism arises out of people’s anger, sometimes justified, at genuine unfairness in government policies. But people also get angry at corporate policies — layoffs only for the sake of higher profits, monopolies that limit opportunities and raise prices. Populism comes from the left — Hugo Chavez — just as much as from the right. Whoever it’s directed at, anger doesn’t help with governing , and anger-driven populism is easily manipulated by unscrupulous politicians, thrives on ignorance and usually leads to suppression of minority opinions and rights.
Populist and other baggage obscures genuine conservative values: compassion, justice, fiscal restraint, individual rights (including privacy) and responsibilities, fairness, transparency in decision-making. Greed is not one of these values, and neither are personality cults. Nor is bowing to leaders who want to scare us into making them temporary dictators. Government should be representative, small, efficient and only intrude into our lives when necessary. But governments need to also be strong, so when it becomes necessary, its intrusion actually makes a difference for the better.
The quality of life for all of us — rich and poor, urban and rural — depends on the values we inherit more than on the newest fads in politics and society or the latest technologies. Real conservatives are the ones who use society’s brakes as life brings inevitable changes to our lives, so that we humans can stay in control of our own destinies and don’t rush over the edge into chaos.
Albert Lea resident David Rask Behling teaches at Waldorf College in Forest City, Iowa, and lives with his wife and children in Albert Lea. His column appears every other Tuesday.
WOULD YOU LIKE TO SHARE THIS STORY?





Comments
Posted by ErnieGann (anonymous) on February 9, 2010 at 12:20 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"Real conservatives are the ones who use society’s brakes as life brings inevitable changes to our lives, so that we humans can stay in control of our own destinies and don’t rush over the edge into chaos"
I agree. Yet liberals chant their mantra of "The party of NO."
Behling is correct when he says that conservatives want us to control our own destiny and prevent the country from "rushing over the edge into chaos" like lemmings over a cliff.
What he DOESN'T explain is how he can utter these homages to conservatism--all the while praising the person and party that is leading the charge over the cliff?
It must be that Orwellian "double-speak"--where words take on meanings OPPOSITE to what they mean in the real world. Example: In Orwell's world, the propaganda ministry was called the "Ministry of Truth."
In the world of the liberal, "conservative" means "less radical than I am." In advocating for the far left while mouthing homilies about "conservative values"--the writer engages in doublespeak. Instead of lemming-like "rushing over the edge into chaos" --a liberal doublespeak metaphor might be "Our beloved leader has provided a diving and swimming opportunity at the base of this beautiful cliff. Don't worry about the drop--after all, the sea is RISING!"
Posted by leftys2221 (anonymous) on February 9, 2010 at 3:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Why is it double speak? Why can conservatism and liberalism be one? Why can a person not combine the best qualities of the two and be an American?
Posted by ErnieGann (anonymous) on February 9, 2010 at 5:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Double-speak happens when things are taken to extreme. The "Ministry for truth" spouts propaganda. The "Internal REvenue Service" confiscates your money. "Universal health" means NOBODY gets good health care. "Re-education camp" means you will be sent to prison and a labor camp. "Government Regulation" means "Government Control."
Doublespeak is a staple of almost any totalitarian society--check Germany, Stalinist Russia, or Maoist China.
Have you never heard of George Orwell? 1984? Animal Farm? How about "Atlas Shrugged" by Ayn Rand? If you had, you would recognize doublespeak--but then, if you HAD done the reading, you wouldn't be a liberal.
"Why can a person not combine the best qualities of the two and be an American?"
It is because they are diametrically opposed. You can't believe in free spending, and still be a conservative.
You can't advocate individual freedom, and be a big-government advocate.
You can't believe in the free market, and believe that government can run the country better than those who have their own time, money, and effort invested.
You can't believe in a balanced budget, but believe in Keynesian economics.
You can't have defending America as your first priority, then gut the military and push a social agenda.
Sorry, Lefty--you can't just give us the "can't we all get along" bromide. Children can get by with wishing. Eventually, adults have to make a choice.
Posted by newyankee (anonymous) on February 10, 2010 at 6:48 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The purposeful mischaracterizing of conservatives including calling Tea Party individuals angry, anti all tax and anti all government shows a complete unwillingness to be completely honest. This is nothing more than a repeat of what we hear every day from the AP dominated media. It is far too common to hear the right is angry, selfish, stupid and all around evil. I would be willing to bet that a vast majority of the Tea Party crowd are very well aware of the need to pay taxes and the need to have functioning government at all levels.
Much of the argument from the left is based on the idea that the left and right are seeking on equal and opposite view of what government must do. When as I see it, it is not entirely the case. In some cases the right might be saying or opposing the notion that government be involved. Some of the arguments from the right might be that it is outside the bounds of the Constitution and that the problem is actually current government involvement.
I think this is why it is so easy for the left and the media to repeat the Democrat talking point that the Republicans are the “party of NO”. To the left there is no other course of action other than another law, regulation or oversight panel. Government must do something for me, it must fight for me is a common feeling.
Post a comment (Terms of Use Policy)
The Tribune encourages healthy, respectful dialogue in the spirit of community enlightenment. It's OK to disagree, but be courteous and civil. Name-calling, vulgarity and claims of criminality are subject to removal.
(Requires free registration.)