Editorial: Restricting access is not the answer
Published 12:00 am Sunday, January 18, 2004
Local governments are still struggling with deep cuts made when the state reduced Local Government Aid to correct its huge deficit, but that cannot be an excuse for city officials to sacrifice staff and public safety nor limit our right to information.
When the city council began discussing broadcasting their meetings, we welcomed the news as another opportunity to ensure the community is well-informed on city issues. But alas, as is usually the case, one thing leads to another, and in researching video capabilities, city staff found asbestos in the ceiling where cable lines would run.
There’s no question the asbestos must be removed. It presents a public health hazard to city workers and the public which cannot be tolerated. Naturally, asbestos removal will cost a pretty penny, though exactly how much has yet to be determined.
Though it may seem prudent to shelve the broadcast idea in order to clean up a health hazard, we caution councilors against postponement of these broadcasts. While it may appear to be a luxury to put in the necessary cable equipment to broadcast meetings, it’s time Albert Lea moved into this century when it comes to offering residents every opportunity to learn about community issues.
City leaders are wrestling with tough budget decisions and are trying to weigh the importance of their expenditures. But they should not compromise public safety or residents’ access to information on city issues.