While we agree with QComp in theory &045;there’s no doubt

a more comprehensive system of teacher evaluation is needed &045;a number of questions remain about its practical application. We will, however, be patient as District 241 considers its options.

The idea of individualizing programs for each school district is disturbing. Although each district in Minnesota is as unique as the students it serves, some teachers move from district to district and there is concern a lack of continuity may create difficulties.

A new system of teacher training and evaluation based on student performance and staff development also has its drawbacks. Some students bring a host of personal issues to the classroom and though most teachers work successfully through those issues, it doesn’t always translate to higher test scores. It would be a shame to deny a good teacher financial compensation because of the dynamics of the classroom &045; many teachers work beyond the confines of the school day to ensure the success of their students.

Regarding staff development, time is already built into every school year for training. What additional steps will be taken to improve teaching methods?

We applaud local school leaders for their pursuit of excellence and urge them on to develop a comprehensive, fair and consistent system for rewarding the very best teachers. We hope parents and teachers will allow the process to work itself through the glitches that are inevitable as a change is considered.