Editorial: Mondale is a good choice for the stadium deal

Published 8:51 am Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Kudos to Gov. Mark Dayton for naming Ted Mondale to lead the Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission. It shows that Dayton is serious about getting a stadium deal done because Mondale is someone who has a proven track record of bridging differences to achieve a greater goal. He helped bring the Hiawatha light rail line into existence.

Often, good plans die because of petty fights and hurt feelings. A big hurdle in a stadium deal — well, besides the roof issue — is getting the various metropolitan entities to find common ground.

In fact, Albert Lea’s own Henry Savelkoul was mentioned in MinnPost.com last Friday in an analysis about Mondale’s appointment. MinnPost writer Jay Weiner noted that few governors in Minnesota have taken stadium issues seriously:

Email newsletter signup

“Under Gov. Tim Pawlenty, no clear-cut leader with any political or public policy gravitas was charged with being the administration’s stadium point person. In fact, not since 1993, when Gov. Arne Carlson appointed former state Rep. Henry Savelkoul to lead efforts to buy out Target Center and build a Twins ballpark, has a governor handed so much clout to one person to gain control of the mine-filled stadium war.”

That said, we give kudos to Republican Rep. Greg Davids of Preston, the chairman of the House Tax Committee. Like this newspaper, he opposes using state tax dollars in forming the public portion of a stadium deal. The stadium benefits the Twin Cities metropolitan area, not places like Roseau, Worthington, Hibbing and Albert Lea. There is no statewide benefit. Thus, the public portion ought to come from metropolitan revenue sources, like how a Hennepin County sales tax funds Target Field.

Let’s review

Here, we reprint an editorial that appeared on Oct. 7, 2009, where we make the case about how a metro-based tax still affects outstate residents:

“Team officials with the Minnesota Vikings were again at the state Legislature on Monday seeking a public-private partnership to fund a stadium to replace the Metrodome.

“Indeed, the Vikings need a new home. The NFL is subsidizing this market $15 to $20 million a year largely because of the aging Metrodome the Vikings play in. You can imagine the pressure from other team owners.

“However, we urge Vikings officials to seek a public-private partnership not with the state but with city and county authorities in the metropolitan area. That’s how the Minnesota Twins found the sales tax revenue for Target Field. And that route frankly is where the political winds in Minnesota are blowing right now. It makes little sense to push for a state-funded partnership that seems fated to fail from the onset.

“Here is why: The people in outstate Minnesota contribute to the economy of the metro area when they visit for sports contests. It costs more for someone from Albert Lea to see a game than someone from, say, the Como neighborhood of St. Paul. An outstater pays for tickets, food and beverages like others, but they also are more likely to pay for parking, hotel, restaurant, gasoline, shopping and even other entertainment.

“A Como resident can take public transportation to the stadium, then head home. An outstater often makes a short vacation out of it.

“We urge metro officials seriously to consider what the Vikings propose. The team owner wishes to invest hundreds of millions of dollars in “Metrodome Next,” and this time, like modern stadiums in other big cities, it should be a boon to the east side of downtown. Moreover, the construction jobs are needed during the lagging economy, and it would be the best time to get decent construction bids.

“The Vikings are renewing their lease at the Metrodome. It runs out in 2011. If anything, metro officials need to come to a clear answer on the question of where the Vikings play.”