Independence Party comes back

Published 9:21 am Tuesday, November 20, 2012

By Tim Nelson, Minnesota Public Radio

ST. PAUL — Control of the Legislature may have turned from the Republicans to the DFL on Nov. 6, but the state’s two biggest parties weren’t the only players in this year’s election drama. The Independence Party — which came to prominence with Jesse Ventura — is back.

In Willmar, Republican state Rep. Bruce Vogel felt the IP’s presence in a race he lost to Democrat Mary Sawatzky.

Email newsletter signup

It was a tough race for the first-term Republican. He lost by 808 votes. There was a lot of outside money coming in, dozens of pieces of literature mailed by both sides, and a barrage of radio ads. But Vogel had one number firmly in mind: 1,457. That’s how many votes went to the Independence Party candidate, Zach Liebel.

“Not a lot, but more than what the margin of victory was,” Vogel said.

While there’s no way to know for sure where the votes cast for Liebel might have gone had he not been in the race — or even if those voters would have shown up at the polls at all — there are some clues.

For example, in Vogel’s district Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney won more than 900 more votes than President Barack Obama.

Vogel isn’t alone in thinking an IP candidate might have cost him the election. First-term Republican state Rep. Rich Murray of Albert Lea was beaten under similar circumstances.

William Wagner, without running a high-profile campaign, still garnered nearly 1,600 votes, more than the difference of 700 between Murray and his opponent Shannon Savick.

Scott Dutcher, a member of the Republican Party of Minnesota’s executive committee, lost his House bid to the Democratic mayor of Elbow Lake, Jay MacNamar.

IP candidate Dave Holman received more than 6 percent in the race, which Dutcher lost by 255 votes, or slightly more than 1 percent. Dutcher suspects his potential constituents may have been trying to signal their unhappiness with the fierce and negative campaign that ran on radio and in mailboxes during the legislative campaign. In a conservative district, Dutcher said he thinks he took it hardest.

“The amount of negative money that was being spent this year was just so overwhelming that there was a section of the population that said, ‘I’m not going to vote for a Democrat or Republican; I’m going to vote for the independent.’ Kind of a protest vote,” he said.

Carleton College political science professor Steven Schier said the effect is small, but it’s something Minnesota hasn’t seen from the IP before. The party is running candidates in outstate races, they’re adjusting to fit the politics of the district and bucking their reputation as a paler blue version of the DFL.

But Schier doesn’t think it’s the second coming of Minnesota’s third party. He said playing the spoiler in a handful of House races isn’t enough for the Independence Party to become a major party with its own line on the ballot. That would take getting 5 percent of the vote statewide in two years.

“Maybe they’re taking their eye off the ball here a little bit, because at the end of the day, they’re going to have to go where the voters are loosely affiliated if they’re really going to make gains, and that’s probably going to be the suburbs,” Schier said.

The IP isn’t making any apologies, though.

“I will be the first one to admit, we do spoil elections,” Independence Party Chairman Mark Jenkins said. “And we’re going to continue to do that until one of two things happens: Either we start spoiling elections for both candidates, and we start to represent the mainstream as sitting legislators, or governor, at the State Capitol, or, until the other two parties recognize there is a vast, vast gap between their ideologies that we’re trying to represent.”

In the meantime, though, they’ll have to focus on getting a statewide candidate who can keep them above that 5 percent threshold.

Gubernatorial candidate Tom Horner’s 12 percent finish in 2010 will only keep the IP on the ballot until 2014.