MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — Two white police officers involved in the fatal shooting of a black man last fall will not face criminal charges, a prosecutor announced Wednesday in a decision that drew outrage from community members who said the move showed the legal system is rigged against African-Americans.

Hennepin County Attorney Mike Freeman said his decision not to charge the officers in the death of 24-year-old Jamar Clark was based on forensic evidence that showed Clark was not handcuffed, as claimed by some people who said they saw the shooting, and had attempted to grab an officer’s weapon, which made them fear for their lives and justified use of deadly force.

Clark ignored warnings to take his hands off Mark Ringgenberg’s gun before he was shot and told Ringgenberg and officer Dustin Schwarze: “I’m ready to die,” the prosecutor said.

Freeman painstakingly described his decision, starting with police reports and witnesses. Community members who attended the presentation said the prosecutor relied too heavily on police accounts and disregarded what others said they saw.

“This is a fairy tale. None of this happened,” said Mel Reeves, an organizer for a group called Twin Cities Coalition 4 Justice 4 Jamar Clark. “It’s not justice. It sends us a clear message that the police are above the law.”

Police union head Bob Kroll said the public should accept the results of the investigation. He appealed for calm.

“Hostility is going to get all of us nowhere,” Kroll said.

Protesters, who demonstrated peacefully across the city after the announcement, had demanded that the case not go to a grand jury, which operates in secret.

Freeman decided the issue on his own.

Police encountered Clark early on Nov. 15 after paramedics called for help from a scene where they were attempting to treat Clark’s girlfriend after she was assaulted. The paramedics said Clark, the assault suspect, was interfering with their work, and they feared for their safety, Freeman said.

When police arrived, Clark kept putting his hands in his pockets and refused orders to show his hands. Officers tried to handcuff Clark but couldn’t. The handcuffs were later dropped, Freeman said.

Ringgenberg then took Clark to the ground and ended up on top of Clark, who was lying on his back. Ringgenberg’s back was to Clark’s stomach, Freeman said.

The officer felt his gun shift from his hip to the small of his back and reached back and felt Clark’s hand on his weapon, Freeman said.

Ringgenberg said, “He’s got my gun,” Freeman said. Schwarze said he put his gun to the edge of Clark’s mouth and warned him to let go or he would shoot. At that point, Clark looked directly at Schwarze and said he was ready to die.

Schwarze said the only thing he could do to save everyone in the area was to pull the trigger.

The shooting happened 61 seconds after police first approached, Freeman said.

Clark’s blood-alcohol level was .09 percent, just above the legal limit to drive in Minnesota. His blood also contained THC, the active compound in marijuana.

Freeman called the handcuff question a key issue in the case and went into particular detail. Twenty civilian witnesses gave different versions of whether Clark was handcuffed. Of the 12 who said he was handcuffed, their stories differed and did not match the forensic evidence, Freeman said.

The prosecutor said he does not believe those witnesses were lying, explaining that it’s not uncommon for people to have contradictory statements when observing chaotic situations from different vantage points.

Forensic evidence showed Clark had no bruising on his wrists consistent with being handcuffed, and his DNA was not found on the inside of the handcuffs, which were on the ground, Freeman said.

In addition, Clark’s DNA was found on Ringgenberg’s belt and on the grip of his gun.

“Clark simply could not have been handcuffed when he attempted to seize the gun while they were on the ground,” Freeman said.

Freeman, who decided earlier this month against taking the case to a grand jury, faced tough questioning from the public at his hourlong presentation, including a woman who called his account “propaganda.”

Investigators had video of Clark’s shooting from several sources, but said early on that it did not provide a full picture of what happened. Freeman released the video publicly on Wednesday.

Public skepticism over grand juries, which do their work in secret, grew after police officers were not indicted in the high-profile deaths of blacks in other cities, including the fatal 2014 shootings of 12-year-old Tamir Rice in Cleveland and 18-year-old Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, as well as the 2014 chokehold death of 43-year-old Eric Garner in New York.

Mica Grimm, an organizer with Black Lives Matter Minneapolis, predicted Freeman would not be re-elected.

“We will not stand for this injustice anymore. We will not come down to the government center and be lied to our faces anymore. If we cannot find justice here, we will find it in the streets.”

Activists rallied Wednesday at the site of Clark’s shooting in north Minneapolis and at a park on the southeast side of downtown. The two groups then converged at the Hennepin County Government Center. The crowd there numbered in the hundreds but remained peaceful as activists chanted and speakers denounced Freeman’s decision.

The FBI, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Minnesota and the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division are conducting a separate federal criminal investigation to determine whether police intentionally violated Clark’s civil rights through excessive force.

Timeline of events in Minneapolis police shooting

— Nov. 15, 2015: Officers respond at 12:45 a.m. to a report of an assault in north Minneapolis. One officer shoots 24-year-old Jamar Clark in the head. Police say a struggle preceded the shooting; people who say they saw the confrontation dispute that and say Clark was handcuffed.

— Nov. 15: Police Chief Janee Harteau asks the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension to investigate. Some protesters set up an encampment outside of the 4th precinct on Minneapolis’ north side.

— Nov. 16: Clark is taken off life support. Minneapolis Mayor Betsy Hodges requests a federal civil rights investigation.

— Nov. 17: BCA Superintendent Drew Evans says investigators have video that doesn’t show the incident in its entirety, and says it won’t be released while the investigation is ongoing.

— Nov. 18: The 4th precinct occupation sees skirmishes between protesters and officers.

— Nov. 19: Police union head Lt. Bob Kroll tells reporters that Clark had his hands on an officer’s weapon when he was shot.

— Nov. 20: Gov. Mark Dayton meets with protest leaders and calls for peace.

— Nov. 23: Dayton says he has seen a video recorded by an ambulance camera and it was inconclusive.

— Nov. 23: Five protesters are shot near the site of the encampment. None are injured seriously. Police eventually charge four men — three white and one Asian.

— Nov. 24: Clark’s family calls for an end to the encampment, but organizers for Black Lives Matter Minneapolis refuse. Also, Hennepin County Attorney Mike Freeman says a grand jury will decide whether to charge the police officers, prompting more outcry from protesters.

— Dec. 3: Police break up the encampment.

— Dec. 23: Protesters demonstrate at Mall of America and Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, disrupting holiday travel. Fifteen people are arrested.

— Dec. 29: Two women who say police hit them in the face with nightsticks during the occupation at the precinct sue the city.

— Feb. 2: Minneapolis officials ask for federal review of how police acted during demonstrations.

— Feb. 9: The American Civil Liberties Union and NAACP sue the state, demanding the release of videos.

— Feb. 10: State investigators say their investigation is finished and evidence has been given to prosecutors.

— Feb. 12: Protesters launch weekly demonstrations at Freeman’s office to demand he not use a grand jury to decide charges.

— Feb. 23: Freeman asks the BCA to expand its investigation.

— March 16: Freeman announces he won’t rely on a grand jury, saying he wants a more accountable, transparent process. He says he hopes to have a decision by the end of March.

— March 17: James Clark, Jamar Clark’s adoptive father, demands the officers be prosecuted.

— March 24: Harteau issues a video message saying police won’t tolerate violence when Freeman announces his decision.

— March 30: Freeman announces that the two officers will not be charged, basing his decision on evidence that showed Clark was not handcuffed, had attempted to gain control of an officer’s weapon and that the officers believed they were in danger of being shot.